home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.imperium.net!usenet
- From: golfball@imperium.net
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: I LOVE USR modems !!!!
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 96 23:58:54 PDT
- Organization: Imperium Internet, Inc.
- Message-ID: <NEWTNews.827913618.8724.GOLFBALL@golfball.imperium.net>
- References: <4h4716$nvo@fstgal00.tu-graz.ac.at> <4hlaoj$7ki@news-1.starnet.net> <4ia8v1$fgu@socrates.aristotle.net> <314C09E4.5C98@fishnet.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: canton22.imperium.net
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage
-
-
- In Article<314C09E4.5C98@fishnet.net>, <jwhite@fishnet.net> write:
- > Path: news.imperium.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.leonardo.net!usenet
- > From: John White <jwhite@fishnet.net>
- > Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- > Subject: Re: I LOVE USR modems !!!!
- > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 04:47:32 -0800
- > Organization: Leonardo Internet
- > Lines: 41
- > Message-ID: <314C09E4.5C98@fishnet.net>
- > References: <4h4716$nvo@fstgal00.tu-graz.ac.at> <4hlaoj$7ki@news-1.starnet.net> <4ia8v1$fgu@socrates.aristotle.net>
- > NNTP-Posting-Host: port48.fishnet.net
- > Mime-Version: 1.0
- > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- > X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB2 (Win95; I)
- >
- > Herschel R wrote:
- > >
- > > In article <4hlaoj$7ki@news-1.starnet.net>, tkeating@cybergate.org (T. Keith Keating) wrote:
- > > >In <4h4716$nvo@fstgal00.tu-graz.ac.at>, <> writes:
- > > >><> schreibt:
- > > >>> hdoan@vworks.com (H Doan) schreibt:
- > > >>> > Finally... true happiness with a product.
- > > >>> > I've gone through 5 different 28.8 modems from various manufactures and I
- > > > can
- > > >>> > attest, the USR is the best modem--- no overrruns, no chokes, no lousy
- > > >>> > disconnects.......(other gushings continued)
- > >
- > > >
- > > >This guy is on GLUE........ and USR support S U C K S........... I know, I have
- > > > been
- > > >dealing with them now for 3 months for this peice of SHIT product, so if you
- > > >know anybody who wants to buy one, I have one for them. SUCKERS.......
- > > >
- > >
- > > I'm not sure I can diagnose a glue head from these spoutings
- > > but I can say that USR support is pitiful. The disconnects
- > > are a major drag. I spent two weeks adjusting my
- > > initialization string so I didn't get disconnects every 3-5
- > > minutes. Now I get them only about once every 30 min to an
- > > hour if I am lucky. I don't feel like screwing with the
- > > string anymore. I'm told it may partially be due to the
- > > modem on the other end but I can't excuse USR for that.
- > > The best advice I can give to a modem buyer is that if you
- > > are mainly going to use it for tcp/ip internet connection
- > > then find out what kind of modems your provider uses and buy
- > > that brand and pay for the lowest priced model that comes
- > > with flash bios changeability (250- 400$). I will not being
- > > buying USR again.
- > >
- > > HR
- >
- > Good point. I never understood the argument that it was the fault of the
- > Rockwell based modem on the other end when other Non-Rockwell modems
- > have no problem staying connected to them. The bottom line is the USR
- > Sportsters don't dynamically handle "degraded" transmission conditions
- > as well as others.
- I second the motion on the sucking support. I couldn't get
- the sportster to even run on mine and MOTOROLA works great!
- GB
-
-